Henry Boot Construction Ltd v Alstom Combined Cycles
The case of ‘Henry Boot Construction Ltd. v Alstom Combined Cycles’ [1999] set a precedent that contractor’s rates do not become reasonable or unreasonable by the execution of variations.
The extent to which bill of quantities (BoQ) rates are applicable for valuing variations in the works, is a common cause of conflict on projects, particularly when there are substantial changes in quantities. This can be a particular issue if the rate in question is abnormally high or low due to the fact that an error has been incurred. Contractors argue that abnormally low rates compound losses, while clients point out that abnormally high rates exaggerate contractor profits.
In the case of Henry Boot Construction Ltd. v Alstom Combined Cycles, Henry Boot Construction Ltd. was employed by Alstom to undertake civil engineering works at a power station. Boot quoted a price for temporary sheet piling and this figure was included in the contract. As the works proceeded however, variation instructions affecting the sheet piling were issued.
Boot’s price was found to have been calculated incorrectly, meaning that the additional quantity required by the variation would have given them a large profit. Boot argued that the contract rates must be adhered to whereas Alstom argued that a fair valuation should be made.
At the trial, the judge emphasised the importance of the contract rates, ruling that they were ‘sacrosanct, immutable, and not subject to correction’ on the basis of one party’s dissatisfaction with them. He referred to Clause 55(2) in the relevant ICE Standard Form (6th ed.) contract which stipulated that there should be no rectification of errors, omissions or estimates, and that a mistake in a rate or price bound both parties equally.
The Court of Appeal endorsed the judge’s ruling in 2000, confirming that pricing errors do not allow the parties to adjust the rates.
The rates may however be adjusted where they are used to value variations:
- Where the works are not executed under similar conditions.
- Where the rate is rendered inapplicable by a substantial change in the quantities.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Grenfell Tower Principal Contractor Award notice
Tower repair and maintenance contractor announced as demolition contractor.
Passivhaus social homes benefit from heat pump service
Sixteen new homes designed and built to achieve Passivhaus constructed in Dumfries & Galloway.
CABE Publishes Results of 2025 Building Control Survey
Concern over lack of understanding of how roles have changed since the introduction of the BSA 2022.
British Architectural Sculpture 1851-1951
A rich heritage of decorative and figurative sculpture. Book review.
A programme to tackle the lack of diversity.
Independent Building Control review panel
Five members of the newly established, Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommended, panel appointed.
Welsh Recharging Electrical Skills Charter progresses
ECA progressing on the ‘asks’ of the Recharging Electrical Skills Charter at the Senedd in Wales.
A brief history from 1890s to 2020s.
CIOB and CORBON combine forces
To elevate professional standards in Nigeria’s construction industry.
Amendment to the GB Energy Bill welcomed by ECA
Move prevents nationally-owned energy company from investing in solar panels produced by modern slavery.
Gregor Harvie argues that AI is state-sanctioned theft of IP.
Heat pumps, vehicle chargers and heating appliances must be sold with smart functionality.
Experimental AI housing target help for councils
Experimental AI could help councils meet housing targets by digitising records.
New-style degrees set for reformed ARB accreditation
Following the ARB Tomorrow's Architects competency outcomes for Architects.
BSRIA Occupant Wellbeing survey BOW
Occupant satisfaction and wellbeing tool inc. physical environment, indoor facilities, functionality and accessibility.
Preserving, waterproofing and decorating buildings.